A common misconception about freezer doors at cold storage facilities is the need to compromise when it comes to refrigerated air temperature control, maximum productivity and low energy costs. The fact is, however, that significant strides in door technology over the years allow cold-storage facilities to have it all.
Rising energy costs-a pressing issue: The bottom line with refrigerated space is to keep cold inside the freezer and heat and humidity out. If not done effectively, energy costs can skyrocket. The old-school approach to achieve this goal is to install doors with high R-value. However, that doesn't always work best when considering the significant energy costs associated with air infiltration through open doors and poor door seals.
The age-old assumption is that a higher R-value equates to less energy costs due to reduced conduction (lost energy through the door panel itself). Although true, there is a point when increasing R-value provides rapidly diminishing returns, and the energy costs associated with conduction are often dwarfed by other factors. For high traffic door openings, energy losses due to infiltration can represent a significantly larger cost component than energy losses due to conduction.
Although R-value is not often a major factor in direct door energy costs, a minimum panel R-value is required to keep the warm-side door surface temperature above the freezing point so that frost and ice won't form on the panel. If the R-value is too low, a panel defrost system with heaters and blowers will be required, and the cost to operate such a system will likely be significant.
The reality is that doors are required to accomplish a lot and the stakes are high. The integrity of the food product is paramount-and proper temperature control is essential. Finding the right door that can help preserve food product integrity without high energy costs can present a conundrum given the challenges and tradeoffs associated with traditional door designs and the operating environments involved.
Traditional door options, methods: The traditional approach to this situation involves heavy, insulated, rigid doors with high R-value. These side-acting doors can be an acceptable solution for low traffic openings, yet they have limitations. Standard hard-core doors are typically slow-moving, which is results in longer door cycle times and higher rates of air infiltration.
As a result, a slow-operating door makes temperature control inside the freezer difficult and hampers productivity. Also, standard hard-core doors are easily damaged when struck by forklifts. A damaged door can result in significant energy losses due to poor sealing, unless the door is quickly repaired.
As an alternative to hard-core doors, high-speed roll-up doors and folding doors are often chosen. These doors move quickly and work to minimize air infiltration via a short open/close cycle time, however they can have poor sealing characteristics. Also, they typically have a very low R-value which is inadequate to prevent frost from forming on the door panel surface itself. To address this concern, it's not uncommon for defrost systems to be added to these doors at an operating cost of $7,000 to $10,000 or more per year.
Other methods and technologies to do the job include strip curtains and air systems, but these designs have their own challenges. Strip curtains, which are thought of as an inexpensive solution, consist of clear plastic strips suspended in the opening. Although the low upfront cost is appealing, they are poor sealing and the energy cost associated with infiltration makes it an expensive choice in almost any freezer application.
Also, their R-value is very low and frost buildup is common. Safety becomes a key issue as scratches in the plastic and frost buildup on the strips often obscure a forklift driver's vision, and the poor seal allows for frost and ice to build up on the floor.